Dragon ball z song remix series#

Hikari no Sasu Mirai e! has substantual third party coverage.Super Survivor has substantual third party coverage.Sabitsuita Machine Gun de Ima o Uchinukō has been covered at least once by Miho Komatsu.Don't You See! was voted one of Izumi Sakai most popular songs by Oricon poll.Dan Dan Kokoro Hikarete 'ku has been covered at least once by Izumi Sakai.Cha-La Head-Cha-La has many covers and releases.Merges aren't permanent, and I have absolutely no problem with re-splitting them if they can support a separate article. Merge all of them here, clean up and expand this list, and then (and only then) start looking at individual soundtracks/albums to see if they can support their own article.

It doesn't matter if any individual album or soundtrack can independantly demonstrate sufficient notability for a separate article at this time, because there isn't a single quality article in the bunch (if there is, point it out, and I will happily retract that statement). Kraftlos ( Talk | Contrib) 09:02, 10 August 2009 (UTC) After the first revert it might be good to discuss, but there could be a chance that no one would opposed you and the edit would stand. Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.192.41.246 ( talk You'll know what I mean if you read the discussion section. Good raise 23:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC) You haven't been to the Kai episodes page lately. – túrian patois 22:47, 9 August 2009 (UTC) I don't see how an edit, however bold it may be, could possibly cause an edit war. Good raise 22:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC) By blinding doing it, it would have easily caused an edit war. – túrian patois 22:07, 9 August 2009 (UTC) I'm aware of that discussion and I fail to see your point. Good raise 21:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Yes, it would have. I was merely trying to emphasize just how obvious this case looks to me. Anyways, I wasn't actually wondering why it needs to be discussed. – túrian patois 21:07, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Merging them would not have been reckless and may have spared us this discussion. And a drastic edit such as this should be discussed. Good raise 20:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC) Because consensus should be reached due to a disagreement. I wonder why this even needs to be discussed. If the resulting list ends up too long, follow summary style. – turian talk 19:13, 5 August 2009 (UTC) Merge them all, whether they are independently notable or not. The current set up requires individual articles, but if that can be achieved, then I recommend merging the list into one. Sarujo ( talk) 17:24, 5 August 2009 (UTC) I think the best course of action would be to parallel the formatting with the Final Fantasy listing (which is also a featured article). Quite frankly, there are just too many Dragon Ball albums to put together in one list. The Hit Song Collection holds more merits due to it being re-released twice and most complation albums and boxsets are derived from this series.

The Final Bout soundtrack was re-dirrected to the game's article. The only thing deserving is the Hit Song Collection series, the American Soundtrack series, and the Game Music series, with the later two already made into list by me.

contribs) 03:25, 5 August 2009 (UTC) I thought they were good track lists.

Dragon ball z song remix series#

As such, merging to a central location, similar to what has been done with other series would be the best option, similar to List of Final Fantasy compilation albums or List of Haruhi Suzumiya albums.

Most are nothing more than stubs with the release date, badly formatted track lists, and a non-free image. The large majority of the Dragon Ball soundtrack albums fail WP:MUSIC and are not notable enough to have their own articles. If an editor wishes to merge them, please be WP:BOLD and do so. Not being familiar with this topic, I am removing the tag but not merging the articles. However, discussion has fizzled out over three years ago with no merge action taking place. There appears to be clear consensus for merging these articles. A summary of the conclusions reached follows. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.